Pavement performance modelling for New Zealand (NZ) roading networks currently relies on Adjusted Structural Number (SNP); a single parameter intended to describe the performance of a multi-layered pavement structure in terms of its rate of deterioration with respect to all structural distress modes as well as non-structural modes. This parameter had its origin in the AASHO Road Test in the late 1950’s before the advent of analytical methods. Refinement to keep abreast of current practice in p...
Read more
Pavement performance modelling for New Zealand (NZ) roading networks currently relies on Adjusted Structural Number (SNP); a single parameter intended to describe the performance of a multi-layered pavement structure in terms of its rate of deterioration with respect to all structural distress modes as well as non-structural modes. This parameter had its origin in the AASHO Road Test in the late 1950’s before the advent of analytical methods. Refinement to keep abreast of current practice in pavement engineering is long over-due.
An advanced model for pavement structural capacity is under development overseas (NCHRP), but it is not in general use because of its complexity (including requirements for destructive test information). The focus of a recent NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) research study has been to set the framework for obtaining the most practical indices for New Zealand pavements based on parameters which are currently stored in RAMM, while at the same time maintaining flexibility for ongoing upgrades that might utilise future developments in the way of pavement data collection. In many pavements, structural distress can be assigned to one or more of at least four discrete categories: rutting, roughness, crack initiation and shear instability (shoving). In this study, data from all NZ’s Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) sites have been analysed to explore the benefits of replacing SNP with four separate “Structural Indices” - each being determined mechanistically (considering stresses and strains induced by an Equivalent Standard Axle) from data commonly available in RAMM.
Each Structural Index has been developed to fall within the same range as the traditional SNP, allowing straightforward implementation with minimal additional calibration needed to implement these in existing NZ Pavement Deterioration models and asset management software such as dTIMS. This paper presents the new developments resulting from the ongoing study, and shows the basis for the new set of Structural Indices and how these can be used to obtain improved prediction of pavement performance, both at network level and for project level rehabilitation of individual roads. The results enable: (i) effective use of all the data contained in RAMM, (ii) more reliable assignment of network Forward Work Programmes, (iii) reduced cost by targeting only those sections of each road that require treatment, and (iv) more efficient design of pavement rehabilitation through informed appreciation of the relevant distress mechanism that will govern the structural life of each individual treatment length.
Pavement performance modelling for New Zealand (NZ) roading networks currently relies on Adjusted Structural Number (SNP); a single parameter intended to describe the performance of a multi-layered pavement structure in terms of its rate of deterioration with respect to all structural distress modes as well as non-structural modes. This parameter had its origin in the AASHO Road Test in the late 1950’s before the advent of analytical methods. Refinement to keep abreast of current practice in pavement engineering is long over-due. An advanced model for pavement structural capacity is under development overseas (NCHRP), but it is not in general use because of its complexity (including requirements for destructive test information). The focus of a recent NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) research study has been to set the framework for obtaining the most practical indices for New Zealand pavements based on parameters which are currently stored in RAMM, while at the same time maintaining flexibility for ongoing upgrades that might utilise future developments in the way of pavement data collection. In many pavements, structural distress can be assigned to one or more of at least four discrete categories: rutting, roughness, crack initiation and shear instability (shoving). In this study, data from all NZ’s Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) sites have been analysed to explore the benefits of replacing SNP with four separate “Structural Indices” - each being determined mechanistically (considering stresses and strains induced by an Equivalent Standard Axle) from data commonly available in RAMM. Each Structural Index has been developed to fall within the same range as the traditional SNP, allowing straightforward implementation with minimal additional calibration needed to implement these in existing NZ Pavement Deterioration models and asset management software such as dTIMS. This paper presents the new developments resulting from the ongoing study, and shows the basis for the new set of Structural Indices and how these can be used to obtain improved prediction of pavement performance, both at network level and for project level rehabilitation of individual roads. The results enable: (i) effective use of all the data contained in RAMM, (ii) more reliable assignment of network Forward Work Programmes, (iii) reduced cost by targeting only those sections of each road that require treatment, and (iv) more efficient design of pavement rehabilitation through informed appreciation of the relevant distress mechanism that will govern the structural life of each individual treatment length.
Hide
Download